Details
Hits: 4307
pdffiledownload

Jurisdiction over Formosa and Pescadores
The Jurisdiction over the occupied territories, Formosa and Pescadores, based on Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and Geneva Conventions (1949)

Jurisdiction (from the Latin ius, iuris meaning "law" and dicere meaning "to speak") shall not come from force occupation or military occupation, but shall comply with Article 8 Article 10 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 3 Article 47 of Fourth Geneva Convention.

When USA occupies Iraq, does USA have the Jurisdiction over the occupied Iraq territories?
No.
Can US army occupy Iraq’s courts and the Judge of US nationality trial Iraq’s nationals?
No.
The Iraq Government has Jurisdiction over Iraq’s territories even though she is under military occupation.

After USA appointed General MacArthur to be the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers to publish General Order number 1 with sending Chiang Kai-shek to occupy Formosa, does USA or her acting force Chiang Kai-shek have Jurisdiction over Japanese Empire’s Formosa?
No.
Can US army or her acting force Chiang Kai-shek occupy Japanese Empire Formosa’s courts and the Judge of ROCnote1 nationality trial Japanese Empire’s nationals?
No.   Please stop that the Chiang Kai-shek’s ROC is still running and its illegal courts to trial and kill civiliansnote2.
The Japanese Empire Government (that is the Re-establishing government of Japan Empire) has Jurisdiction over Japanese Empire’s territories even though she is under military occupation.

UN NGO RCJE
Presidency President
Selig S.N. Tsai 蔡世能
Published date: 18 April 2016

Details
Hits: 11482
pdffile | download

政府公告http://regovje.org/index.php/tw/proclamations/27h2

大日本帝國重建政府 台灣 澎湖 住宅政策 (Document No. 27h)

推廣社會住宅：依都會區需求畫分承租價格，最低的社會住宅承租價格，每月1帝元為承租費。此承租費做為住宅管理、修繕之運用。
大日本帝國臣民及保護國之國民，每人可享有40坪自購屋之購屋權，多於40坪，則課取50倍之稅率。
無本重建政府核發之臣民證、居民證或非保護國之國民者，於本公告2年後，2017年10月24日起，其所持有土地或房屋之契約，均屬無效文件。
持有本重建政府核發之臣民證、居民證或保護國之國民者，除上開購屋權外，另得享有社會住宅優先承租權。每人以40坪為限，並且不得轉手或出租。
中國難民-亦即持中華民國國民身分證者，而無依親證明者或對大日本帝國國家無重建貢獻者，應依國際公約規定，予以人道照顧，並儘速遣返原國籍國之中華人民共和國。

 

2015 平成27年10月24日

大日本帝國 重建政府
(次) 內閣總理大臣
Selig S.N. Tsai 蔡世能

 

Details
Hits: 3176
pdffile | download

政府公告http://regovje.org/index.php/en/proclamations/sovereign-rights

Promulgation ”平成27年 1st instruction”
on Restoring Sovereignty Day

平成27 年1st instruction (instruction of exercising sovereign rights)

Subject:
Meiji Constitution, and all laws under Meiji Constitution, the gradual implementation has exercised by the re-establishing Government of Japan Empire.

Details:
The law, coming into effect or being invalidated, shall be promulgated.
Meiji Constitution, and all laws under Meiji Constitution, they are still valid in the territories of Japan Empire, including in Taiwan and Penghu.

Past due to the Imperial Japanese Government “temporarily disappeared” under military occupation in 1947, so that the laws of Meiji Constitution cannot be performed.

And within USA as the Principal Occupying Power, condoned its Chinese rebels Chiang Kai-shek (now known as Chinese Taipei) to enlarge pillages in our territory of Taiwan and Penghu, caused 228 massacre of massacring Imperial Japanese citizens, killing all non-engineering class intellectual civilians, occupying all our civil governments and civilian resources, plundering banks and lands, robbing civilians by exchanging forty thousand old Taiwan Dollars for one New Taiwan Dollar, enslaving the civilians of the occupied State, conscripting the occupied civilians, controlling over educations and the medias, teaching wrong knowledge to make the people lives on Taiwan Penghu without correct human rights history and without concepts of international laws. Such sin and karma is as great as Buddhist said Sumeru mountain.

Until 平成 26 year, on 2014 February 20, the United Nations’ NGO (Rescue Committee for the people of Japan Empire) RCJE led Japan Empires’ subjects swear an oath together:
“Eternal allegiance to His Majesty the Emperor, complying with all Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their three Additional Protocols.”
The re-establishing government of Japan Empire has formed and informing the United Nations’ ambassadors, sending national formal credentials to the Swiss Federal Council for being the High Contracting Party of Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols.

In Taiwan Penghu, the exercising sovereign rights and all of human rights’ laws shall be performed by the re-establishing government of Japan Empire with Meiji Constitution and all the laws provide through Meiji Constitution, with complying all the provisions of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, with conforming to the UN Charter as a criterion. (Particularly on Article 2, paragraph 4: All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.)

For all the aggression that carried out in territory of occupied Japan Empire, Taiwan Penghu, by the United States and its "Chinese rebels Chiang Kai-shek" (Chinese Taipei), to occupy local civil governments, courts, schools at all levels, educations, public utilities, lands, forests, water, and conscripting soldiers, levying taxes ... etc. Such acts of war crimes and crimes of aggression shall stop immediately.
The old Governor-General's Office and all civil governments' agencies and civil resources (including the list above), these shall be immediately returned to re-establishing government.
When the United States and its "Chinese rebels Chiang Kai-shek" (Chinese Taipei), have not leave yet from our territory Taiwan Penghu, shall all the time comply with all the provisions of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and truly practice the protection of human rights.

平成27 年 2015 April 28
Restoring Sovereignty Day

the Re-establishing Government of Japan Empire
(Sec.) Prime Minister

Selig S.N. Tsai 蔡  世能

 

p.s.

war crimes

Stop recruiting the protected persons of the occupied State.
(Art. 51 of 4th Geneva Convention provides ‘The Occupying Power may not compel protected persons to serve in its armed or auxiliary forces. No pressure or propaganda which aims at securing voluntary enlistment is permitted.’
Art. 147 of 4th Geneva Convention prohibits ‘compelling a protected person to serve in the forces of a hostile Power.’)

Prohibit the occupied persons from being required to swear allegiance to the enemy power.  All schools should stop raise ROC’s flag and sing its national anthem.  Should sing the common national anthem “君が代”  of both Japan and the Japan Empire.
(Art. 45 of 4th Hague Convention states ‘It is forbidden to compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to swear allegiance to the hostile Power.’
Art. 51 commentary para.1 of 4th Geneva Convention states ‘Its object is to protect the inhabitants of the occupied territory from actions offensive to their patriotic feelings or from attempts to undermine their allegiance to their own country.’)  


Article 144 of Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, provides “The duty incumbent upon States by virtue of Article 144 is general and absolute in character. It must be carried out in peacetime and wartime alike.”
Whether in wartime or peacetime, should disseminate the text of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 as widely as possible, especially in the occupied territory, every place of any size should be given a text of the Convention. The text of the Convention must be posted in every notice board of public authorities. Any civilian, military, police or other authorities must possess the text of the Convention, for protecting the protected persons who may have to render an account of their shortcomings before the courts and who, in some cases, are likely to become beneficiaries.

The non-difference attacking civilians, violates the fourth Hague Convention of 1907, the Convention provides:
Art. 23. ‘In addition to the prohibitions provided by special Conventions, it is especially forbidden; …To employ arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering; …’
Art. 25. ‘The attack or bombardment, by whatever means, of towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings which are undefended is prohibited.’
Art. 27. In sieges and bombardments all necessary steps must be taken to spare, as far as possible, buildings dedicated to religion, art, science, or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals, and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not being used at the time for military purposes.
It is the duty of the besieged to indicate the presence of such buildings or places by distinctive and visible signs, which shall be notified to the enemy beforehand.

The United States and its "Chinese rebels Chiang Kai-shek" (Chinese Taipei) Occupying our civil governments and civil resources, including occupying courts, lands, water, banks... etc., which violates the fourth Hague Convention of 1907, the Convention provides:
Art. 28.The pillage of a town or place, even when taken by assault, is prohibited.
Art. 43. The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.
Art. 47. Pillage is formally forbidden.

The United States and its "Chinese rebels Chiang Kai-shek" (Chinese Taipei) Occupying Taiwan Grand Shrine, local Shinto shrines, Butoku temples, school in all levels, museums..., etc. Which violates the fourth Hague Convention of 1907, the Convention provides:
Art. 56. The property of municipalities, that of institutions dedicated to religion, charity and education, the arts and sciences, even when State property, shall be treated as private property.
All seizure of, destruction or willful damage done to institutions of this character, historic monuments, works of art and science, is forbidden, and should be made the subject of legal proceedings.


aggression of war crimes

“act of aggression” means the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations. Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, in accordance with United Nations General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974, qualify as an act of aggression:


The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof;

...

The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.